>That’s why the current conversation about AI so often feels silly. People keep asking whether the prose sounds natural. That’s the least interesting part. The dangerous part is that the prose sounds natural even when the reasoning underneath it is shaky enough to qualify as decorative
The real problem is this post itself is AI generated slop, with all the tell-tale markings.
"One of the most useful things Shannon did was lower the temperature. He didn’t say machines had to play perfect chess. He said they had to play “tolerably good” chess."
That's not what temperature means in LLM AI. It's also not temperature in what Shannon did there (he merely lowered the requirements).
>That’s why the current conversation about AI so often feels silly. People keep asking whether the prose sounds natural. That’s the least interesting part. The dangerous part is that the prose sounds natural even when the reasoning underneath it is shaky enough to qualify as decorative
The real problem is this post itself is AI generated slop, with all the tell-tale markings.
"One of the most useful things Shannon did was lower the temperature. He didn’t say machines had to play perfect chess. He said they had to play “tolerably good” chess."
That's not what temperature means in LLM AI. It's also not temperature in what Shannon did there (he merely lowered the requirements).
Thanks for sharing your opinion. I'd love to read your interpretation.